<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Flickr tip &#8211; Add TITLE and Description to every image</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.danperry.com/blog/flickr-titles-and-descriptions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.danperry.com/blog/flickr-titles-and-descriptions/</link>
	<description>Discussing golf marketing, internet marketing, SEO and golf course reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 19:23:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: danperry</title>
		<link>http://www.danperry.com/blog/flickr-titles-and-descriptions/comment-page-1/#comment-4130</link>
		<dc:creator>danperry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 02:30:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danperry.com/wordpress/flickr-titles-and-descriptions/#comment-4130</guid>
		<description>@Jim L I don&#039;t think it&#039;s very important in cases liek this. Remember that a good percentage of my pics (and yours) have nothing to do with anything in particular, and wouldn&#039;t benefit from ranking for anything in the SERP&#039;s. 

I do write reviews of most of the golf courses I play, so the value of ranking for the golf course name is apparent. Although there&#039;s no money involved (I don&#039;t monetize this blog; more interested in sharing my opinion), there is value to me in ranking. 

As for your question, it is and it isn&#039;t. I think it depends on the goal. Is there value in having the image ranked? If there isn&#039;t, no biggie (here&#039;s an example: http://www.flickr.com/photos/golf_pictures/2569749823/). If there is, it&#039;s worth considering.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jim L I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s very important in cases liek this. Remember that a good percentage of my pics (and yours) have nothing to do with anything in particular, and wouldn&#8217;t benefit from ranking for anything in the SERP&#8217;s. </p>
<p>I do write reviews of most of the golf courses I play, so the value of ranking for the golf course name is apparent. Although there&#8217;s no money involved (I don&#8217;t monetize this blog; more interested in sharing my opinion), there is value to me in ranking. </p>
<p>As for your question, it is and it isn&#8217;t. I think it depends on the goal. Is there value in having the image ranked? If there isn&#8217;t, no biggie (here&#8217;s an example: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/golf_pictures/2569749823/" rel="nofollow">http://www.flickr.com/photos/golf_pictures/2569749823/</a>). If there is, it&#8217;s worth considering.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim L</title>
		<link>http://www.danperry.com/blog/flickr-titles-and-descriptions/comment-page-1/#comment-4129</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 15:02:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danperry.com/wordpress/flickr-titles-and-descriptions/#comment-4129</guid>
		<description>Many of my photos are of pets, animals, nature, etc.  How important do you think it is with those kind of photos?  For instance, this one:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/jimbl/2573026948/

Just curious, title isn&#039;t really indicative of the photo, but putting exactly what the photo is seems boring.  Thoughts?

Jim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many of my photos are of pets, animals, nature, etc.  How important do you think it is with those kind of photos?  For instance, this one:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/jimbl/2573026948/" rel="nofollow">http://www.flickr.com/photos/jimbl/2573026948/</a></p>
<p>Just curious, title isn&#8217;t really indicative of the photo, but putting exactly what the photo is seems boring.  Thoughts?</p>
<p>Jim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: danperry</title>
		<link>http://www.danperry.com/blog/flickr-titles-and-descriptions/comment-page-1/#comment-4066</link>
		<dc:creator>danperry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 01:26:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danperry.com/wordpress/flickr-titles-and-descriptions/#comment-4066</guid>
		<description>I normally add a strong TITLE, then leave the rest blank. That&#039;s going to change, post haste!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I normally add a strong TITLE, then leave the rest blank. That&#8217;s going to change, post haste!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim L</title>
		<link>http://www.danperry.com/blog/flickr-titles-and-descriptions/comment-page-1/#comment-4064</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 14:11:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danperry.com/wordpress/flickr-titles-and-descriptions/#comment-4064</guid>
		<description>I usually title and describe my photos, but mine are usually more &quot;story&quot; like rather then keyword heavy.  I don&#039;t even have a Flickr pro account, but I would suspect in the next week or two I will upgrade and be able to see stats then.  Good info though, I will have to try a little more detail with my stories. :)

Jim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I usually title and describe my photos, but mine are usually more &#8220;story&#8221; like rather then keyword heavy.  I don&#8217;t even have a Flickr pro account, but I would suspect in the next week or two I will upgrade and be able to see stats then.  Good info though, I will have to try a little more detail with my stories. <img src='http://www.danperry.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Jim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

